Meizu M3E Max vs ZTE Axon Max: 6.0-inch, 3GB RAM

Don’t miss this interesting battle between two big phones: Meizu M3E Max vs ZTE Axon Max. When we say “big phones”, we aren’t kidding! Both comes with 6.0-inch full HD display and huge battery above 4000 mAh

Meizu M3E Max vs ZTE Axon Max

Meizu M3E Max vs ZTE Axon Max: 6.0-inch display, 4140 mAh battery

Firstly, Meizu M3 Max or ZTE Axon Max, which is stronger phone.  Both come with Octa-core CPU and 3GB RAM. However, Meizu M3 comes to this battle with MediaTek Helio P10 with 1.8GHz max speed, meanwhile, ZTE Axon Max comes with SnapDragon 617 processor with 1.5GHz speed. Actually, both processors are good in doing multiple tasks, but SnapDragon 617 get higher evaluation from users. So, ZTE Axon Max is the winner in this round of processor battle.

The camera is also an important feature when picking a smartphone. As for Meizu M3 Max, the phone comes with 13MP main camera along with 5MP selfie shooter. On the other hand, ZTE Axon Max is in way better than its counterpart. This phone comes with a really good camera combination, with 16MP main camera and 13MP camera selfie snapper. So, if you are a photo lover, ZTE Axon Max could be a better choice in Meizu M3 Max vs ZTE Axon Max battle.

Meizu M3E Max vs ZTE Axon Max

Both smartphones arrives with huge battery capacities. ZTE Axon Max arrives with 4140 mAH cell, which is 40 mAh bigger than that of Meizu M3E Max (4100 mAH). Moreover, the fast charge technology (Fast charge 2.0) is only appear on the ZTE Axon Max, which allows to charge 60$ in 30 min.

Meizu M3E Max vs ZTE Axon Max: Pricing

Before picking the winner in Meizu M3E Max vs ZTE Axon Max battle, let’s consider the price. ZTE Axon Max is now available to buy and it costs $443 (RM. 1,809). Meanwhile, Meizu M3E Max price is $254 (RM. 1037). So in this battle, both phones come with huge batteries (4140 mAH vs 4100 mAh) and big screen (6.0-inch). ZTE Axon Max get better camera on both rear and front side. But when consider the price, Meizu M3 Max is more cheaper than than its rival (RM. 1037 vs RM. 1809). So, tell us your winner!